Search for: "5 Unknown State Employees"
Results 1 - 20
of 723
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2017, 7:50 pm
Cal.) -- dismissing complaint because plaintiff improperly named an employee of the Executive Office for United States Attorneys as the defendant instead of the agency; stating in dicta that agency appeared to have conducted adequate search for records, which was sole issue in dispute.Summaries of all opinions issued since April 2015 available here. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
The post 5 Steps to Gaining Employee Support During a Transformation appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:08 pm
Federal law preempted state law, the court concluded; thus, the Massachusetts employee classification law did not apply to franchise relationships. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 3:36 pm
The Idaho State Police Life Saving Award is awarded to an ISP employee who saves the life of another person, whether on-duty or off-duty and represents the highest ideals of an Idaho State Police officer [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 3:00 am
Being terminated from a job can create many unknowns, particularly financial ones. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 3:00 am
Being terminated from a job can create many unknowns, particularly financial ones. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Equally important is to identify the questions and unknowns that remain, which are substantial. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 8:49 pm
We did not identify any ill employees. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:35 pm
5. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 9:49 am
It is unknown by many that some private employers have to buy federal workers' compensation insurance coverage for their employees. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 3:53 pm
John Does 1-5, United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, Civil Action File No. 1:17-cv-03843-CAP. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 3:53 pm
John Does 1-5, United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, Civil Action File No. 1:17-cv-03843-CAP. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:37 am
A federal law, the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 6:03 am
About 5½ weeks after the initial closure of non-essential workplaces, [the employee] was terminated. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 6:03 am
About 5½ weeks after the initial closure of non-essential workplaces, [the employee] was terminated. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 2:36 pm
On August 5, 2021, the California Department of Public Health (“CDPH”) became the first state to issue an order that requires COVID-19 vaccinations for health care workers, allowing only for certain religious or medical exemptions. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:46 pm
About 5½ weeks after the initial closure of non-essential workplaces, [the employee] was terminated. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:46 pm
About 5½ weeks after the initial closure of non-essential workplaces, [the employee] was terminated. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:34 pm
5. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:55 am
All state laws vary. [read post]
